One capability that the service has transitioned to that will play a key role in Project Overmatch is “over-the-air software delivery,” he said. “So, you got to figure out, how are we going to do this … and do it inside of the cycles that the Navy has for how we build readiness?” “You can’t create a whole new job series in the Navy to be able to operate the system and expect to do that” all at once. The Navy is taking an “incremental approach” with Project Overmatch, he said. ![]() No matter the system, introducing new capabilities across the entire service is one of the hardest things to do, he said. “What we’re learning, without getting into specifics on the technologies and things, it’s hard,” Small said at the conference. The testing with the Vinson strike group is the “starting gun” for Project Overmatch, Small said. The experiment currently involves “about eight ships, across many different networks and many different types of data,” Gilday said during a panel discussion hosted by the Brookings Institution in June.įor fiscal year 2023, the Navy received $226 million in research-and-development funding for Project Overmatch, and the service is requesting $192 million for fiscal year 2024, according to service budget documents. Michael Gilday said the Navy is testing technologies related to the project on the Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group off the coast of California. “It’s joint, it’s all-domain, but it comes down to … command and control.”Ĭhief of Naval Operations Adm. “It still comes down to the art of command and control, and what it is that we provide architecturally to allow those commanders at all levels to be able to exercise” that capability, he said. I can’t get into specifics - only thing I can say is that each service has unique needs for how to command and control forces” in the operating environment. “The operational architecture that we’re developing … is all about naval power on behalf of the Joint Force,” Small said during a panel discussion at the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space conference in April. But while the “joint” part of JADC2 is important, each service faces different command-and-control challenges, he said. Doug Small, the commander of Naval Information Warfare Systems Command and the program manager for Project Overmatch. Once operational, Project Overmatch will ultimately flow into a “joint command structure,” said Rear Adm. “What Project Overmatch is designed to do is” use software to translate “automatically between different communication systems,” he said. ![]() Like the other services, the Navy has a variety of communication systems that are not necessarily interoperable, “and you have to create gateways that connect them together, or you’ve got to put multiple radios on everything in the force to be able to allow them to communicate,” Clark said in an interview. The aim of Project Overmatch is to “create a more interoperable force, allowing more pieces of the Navy - more ships, more aircraft, more unmanned systems later on - to be able to connect with one another and talk to one another, using the Navy’s wildly diverse collection of communication systems,” said Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at Hudson Institute. The Army has held annual Project Convergence experiments and Air Force leadership has openly discussed its plans for the Advanced Battle Management System, but the Navy has remained tight-lipped about Project Overmatch, the service’s component of the JADC2 initiative to connect sensors to shooters across all warfighting domains. ![]() NATIONAL HARBOR, Maryland - The Navy has revealed little about its contribution to the Defense Department’s joint all-domain command and control initiative but has started experimenting with systems that will bring the concept to life at sea, service leaders say. Part 6 of 7-part special report on the Defense Department’s joint all-domain command and control, or JADC2, concept.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |